Rewriting the conserved quantity of the expanding sphere gives the Friedmann equation — the equation at the heart of modern cosmology — and a Newtonian derivation that is exact.
The expanding-sphere page ended with a conserved quantity E. In Lecture 7 Guth rewrites it in the form every cosmologist uses: the Friedmann equation. It relates how fast the universe expands to what it contains and to a single constant, k, which will turn out to describe the shape of space.
Since a˙/a=H, the left side is the square of the Hubble rate. The equation says: the expansion rate is set by the density, corrected by the constant k.
The Russian physicist Alexander Friedmann derived this equation from general relativity in 1922, in a paper on universes with positive k, followed in 1924 by one on negative k. (In the lecture Guth recalls the dates as 1922 and 1923; the second paper actually appeared in 1924.) Guth calls the pair below together "the Friedmann equations":
The two Friedmann equations (pressureless matter)
(aa˙)2=38πGρ−a2kc2,a¨=−34πGρa
In words
( a dot over a ) squared equals 8 pi over 3 G rho minus kc squared over a squared , a double dot equals minus 4 pi over 3 G rho a
It may seem surprising that a Newtonian calculation reproduces general relativity exactly. Guth's argument is homogeneity. Look at a small box, say one metre across. Inside it, the expansion velocities are tiny and gravity is weak, so general relativity must agree with Newton's theory there. But the universe is homogeneous: if you understand one small box, you understand every box, and so the whole universe. (This works for pressureless matter; radiation and dark energy need the relativistic additions mentioned above.)
So far r and ri were in metres. Guth now makes the comoving coordinate's unit explicit: say a particle's coordinate ri is 5 notches if it was 5 metres from the origin at the initial time ti. Then
Physical radius with notches
r[m]=a(t)[m/notch]×ri[notch],a(ti)=1m/notch
In words
r [ m ] equals a(t) [ m/notch ] times r sub i [ notch ], a(t sub i ) equals 1 m/notch
So the numberk depends on how big a notch is. Two conventions are common:
Make a=1 today. Then a notch is a metre today (the convention of Barbara Ryden's textbook, for example).
Choose the notch so that k=+1 or −1. The sign of k cannot be changed by rescaling; if k=0, the notch is left arbitrary.
Either way, notches and the bare number k never appear in any physical prediction. Physical results depend only on the sign of k and on notch-free combinations such as kc2/a2, which later turns out to measure the curvature of space. Guth thinks the k=±1 convention is the more common one in textbooks.
Worked example
Checking the rearrangement
Show that a22E gives the left side of the rearranged equation, and confirm that the Friedmann equation has consistent units.
Multiplying E by 2/a2 and defining k=−2E/c2 gives the Friedmann equation, (a˙/a)2=38πGρ−kc2/a2.
Friedmann derived it from general relativity in 1922; for pressureless matter, the Newtonian derivation is exact because a homogeneous universe is understood from any small region.
With comoving coordinates in notches, a has units m/notch and k has units 1/notch²; the bare number k is not physical, but its sign and the combination kc2/a2 are.
With pressure, the first Friedmann equation survives; the a¨ equation changes.